Display of Religious Tenants Debated 

 

 Editorial on the story Has the city violated Summum’s First Amendment rights and must erect the aphorisms?  Why?  What is the first amendment?  


1 Response to “First Amendment: Display of Religious Tenants Debated”

  1. 1 Hannah Jornacion

    “When you have a Statue of Liberty, would you have to have a Statue of Despotism?”

    I understand what point he’s trying to prove by using despotism, but for some reason I thought Statue of Slavery would have been a better… er, antonym instead.

    I don’t really get why they didn’t want to display them though. I looked for the seven aphorisms and they didn’t seem Rated R at all. It seems like a scientific kind of theology [aside from the whole mummification process, that's just creepy]. Whatever. I don’t really care that much, to be honest. I just thought it was kinda interesting.

Leave a Reply